In Practice
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS EVENTS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
In Practice 28:228-229 (2006)
© 2006 British Veterinary Association


PRACTICE MANAGEMENT

DECISION MAKING

Everyday ethics

THIS series gives readers the opportunity to consider and contribute to the discussion of some of the ethical dilemmas that can arise in veterinary practice. Each month, a case scenario is presented, followed by discussion of some of the issues involved. In addition, a possible way forward is suggested; however, there is rarely a cut-and-dried answer in such cases, and readers may wish to suggest an alternative approach. This month's dilemma - on the `trotter struggling to walk' - is discussed by Joy Pritchard. Readers with comments to contribute should send them as soon as possible, so that they can be considered for publication in the next issue.

This series is being coordinated by Siobhan Mullan, of the University of Bristol. It is hoped that it will provide a framework that will help practices find solutions when facing similar dilemmas. On page 229, she comments on the `in the owner's interests?' dilemma, which was published last month.

Joy Pritchard graduated from Edinburgh in 1994 and spent four years in mixed practice in the UK, and two years as a veterinary volunteer in India. Since 2000 she has worked for the Brooke Hospital for Animals, where she is currently Head of Animal Welfare. She holds the RCVS certificate in animal welfare science, ethics and law.







HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS EVENTS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 2006 British Veterinary Association