In Practice
HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS EVENTS FEEDBACK HELP
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
In Practice 28:623-624 (2006)
© 2006 British Veterinary Association


PRACTICE MANAGEMENT

DECISION MAKING

Everyday ethics

THIS series gives readers the opportunity to consider and contribute to the discussion of some of the ethical dilemmas that can arise in veterinary practice. Each month, a case scenario is presented, followed by discussion of some of the issues involved. In addition, a possible way forward is suggested; however, there is rarely a cut-and-dried answer in such cases, and readers may wish to suggest an alternative approach. Readers who wish to contribute to the discussion of this month's dilemma - 'Owner's dying wish' - are invited to do so and should send their comments as soon as possible, so that they can be considered for publication in the next issue. Responses to the 'Difficult dog' dilemma, which was published last month, appear on page 624.

This series is being coordinated by Siobhan Mullan, of the University of Bristol. It is hoped that it will provide a framework that will help practices find solutions when facing similar dilemmas. This month's dilemma is presented and discussed by James Yeates.

James Yeates graduated from Bristol in 2004. He has since worked in small animal practice while undertaking a BSc in bioethics, and is now enrolled on a PhD in veterinary ethics and law. He is a member of SPVS council with an interest in recent graduate issues.







HOME CURRENT ISSUE TABLE OF CONTENTS ARCHIVE SEARCH SUBSCRIPTIONS EVENTS FEEDBACK HELP
Copyright © 2006 British Veterinary Association